Karl Friberg vs Daniele Rapagnetta Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Friberg's recent second serve winning percentage is 42.33%, notably lower than Rapagnetta's 52.45%. Is this indicative of Rapagnetta's stronger serve? Yes, it likely gives Rapagnetta an edge in serving games.
• Regarding second serve returns, Friberg recently won 54.62% of points, outperforming Rapagnetta's 44.93%. Does this suggest Friberg is better at capitalizing on opponent weaknesses? Yes, Friberg might exploit Rapagnetta's second serve.
• First serve return success reveals a similar pattern: Friberg edges out with 34.57% compared to Rapagnetta's 28.64%, indicating a strategic edge in return games.
• Under pressure, Rapagnetta excels with a 53.66% breakpoint save rate over Friberg's 48%. Could this hint at Rapagnetta's resilience in crucial moments? Indeed, Rapagnetta may perform better under pressure.
• In the past year, Friberg has a 50% match win rate, slightly trailing Rapagnetta's 51.22%, suggesting a marginal overall advantage for Rapagnetta.
• On hard surfaces, Rapagnetta boasts a better career win rate of 61% compared to Friberg's 58%, again hinting at Rapagnetta's slight upper hand.
• Both players frequently compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, yielding similar win rates, although Rapagnetta's higher quality opponents (average rank 348.73) suggest a potentially higher competitive experience.
• In deciding sets, Rapagnetta has a stronger performance, winning 63% compared to Friberg's 50%, indicating a greater likelihood of enduring through tight matches.
• Remarkably, Friberg's breakpoint conversion rate of 47.37% dwarfs Rapagnetta's 25.68%, suggesting a significant advantage in breaking opponent serves.

Editorial Prediction (August 20, 2025, UTC):

In assessing the match between Friberg and Rapagnetta, it is evident that Rapagnetta presents a stronger second serve, which generally correlates with better overall match performance.

While Friberg excels in returning second serves and has higher breakpoint conversion effectiveness, Rapagnetta's superior performance under pressure and slightly better overall win rates suggest a competitive edge. Additionally, Rapagnetta's ability to win deciding sets further supports their case.

Considering the various statistics, Rapagnetta appears to have a broader advantage, especially when factoring in surface preferences and opponent quality. Thus, Rapagnetta is the likely winner in the upcoming match.